When SSDs first entered the market, it looked like a revolution in the field of Data Recovery storage devices. Their read and write speeds seemed so impressive as well as their reliability even when compared to RAID storage systems.
However, most users who encountered an SSD for the first time in their life thought that it was supposed to work for many years as long as the new design had no moving parts.
So they thought that SSDs should be less prone to failures and errors. The fewer parts that are likely to fail, the more reliable a device is.
Yet daily practice shows that this logical assumption can sometimes be wrong. As soon as the first SSDs went on sale, users began to test them Data Recovery to find out, empirically, the real reliability of the new drives. Even renowned laboratories have followed suit.
Some tests confirmed that SSDs were as reliable as conventional HDDs, while others suggested that SSDs and HDDs were only as reliable for the first two years, and then a disk was as reliable as luck would have it. It has become apparent that SSDs are also error prone and can fail completely, in the worst case.
